Member-only story

Implications Of Remote Warfare For International Society Contemporary Security

Sam Carter

·6.8k Followers· Follow

Published in Drones And Global Order: Implications Of Remote Warfare For International Society (Contemporary Security Studies)

4 min read

399 View Claps

84 Respond

Save

Listen

Remote warfare, also known as unmanned warfare or drone warfare, refers to the use of unmanned vehicles, such as drones or missiles, to carry out military operations without putting military personnel at risk. While remote warfare has been touted as a more precise and less risky way to conduct warfare, it has also raised a number of concerns about its implications for international society and contemporary security.

Drones and Global Order: Implications of Remote Warfare for International Society (Contemporary Security Studies)

by Ray LaHood

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1048 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	498 pages

Ethics of Remote Warfare

One of the primary ethical concerns about remote warfare is the potential for civilian casualties. Because unmanned vehicles are often operated remotely from thousands of miles away, there is a greater risk of誤殺(mistakenly killing) civilians. In addition, the use of drones and missiles can create a psychological distance between the operator and the target, which can lead to a decreased sense of responsibility for civilian casualties.

Another ethical concern about remote warfare is the potential for mission creep. Mission creep occurs when the scope of a military operation expands beyond its original objectives. In the case of remote warfare, mission creep can occur when unmanned vehicles are used to carry out operations that would not be possible with traditional military forces. For example, drones have been used to carry out assassinations and targeted killings, which are highly controversial and may violate international law.

Legality of Remote Warfare

The legality of remote warfare is also a matter of debate. Some experts argue that remote warfare violates international law, while others argue that it is a legitimate form of warfare. The United States, for example, has argued that the use of drones is legal under international law because it is a form of self-defense against terrorism. However, other countries, such as Pakistan, have argued that the use of drones violates their sovereignty and is illegal under international law.

Accountability for Remote Warfare

Another concern about remote warfare is the lack of accountability for civilian casualties. Because unmanned vehicles are operated remotely, it is often difficult to determine who is responsible for civilian casualties. This can lead to a lack of accountability and a decreased incentive to avoid civilian casualties.

Human Rights Implications of Remote Warfare

Remote warfare also has a number of implications for human rights. The use of drones and missiles can create a climate of fear and intimidation, which can lead to human rights abuses. In addition, the use of remote warfare can make it more difficult to hold governments accountable for human rights violations.

Remote warfare is a new and rapidly evolving technology that has a number of implications for international society and contemporary security. While remote warfare has the potential to make warfare more precise and less risky, it also raises a number of ethical, legal, and human rights concerns. It is important to carefully consider these concerns before using remote warfare and to develop safeguards to protect civilians and ensure accountability.

Drones and Global Order: Implications of Remote Warfare for International Society (Contemporary Security Studies)

by Ray LaHood

5 out of 5